Home

Archives by Month
Archives by Author

Five Ohio Mystery Authors.
Five different points of view.
Five fresh voices.
Because mystery is a state of mind...


Website - Books


Website - Books


Books


Website - Books


Website - Books


  • Events
    • No events.


  • Website - Books


    Website - Books

    Design by
    DreamForge Media

    Understanding Mitochondrial DNA by DP Lyle, MD

    **The Little Blog of Murder welcomes D. P. Lyle, MD, a Macavity Award winning and Edgar Award® nominated author of both fiction and non-fiction. Welcome, D.P.!**

    Writers ask me all sorts of questions about medical and forensic
    issues. Many deal with DNA, which is now widely understood by most
    writers. But the special type of DNA that we call mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) still
    stumps many authors. It’s actually quite simple.

    The DNA used for standard DNA testing is nuclear DNA, which resides only within the cell’s nucleus. It is the DNA that determines your genetic make-up, that makes you, you. Half of this comes from mom and half from dad. But, cells also contain non-nuclear DNA, which is found within the mitochondria. Mitochondria are small structures that reside within the cytoplasm (the soup) of the cell and serve as the cell’s energy production center. A small amount of DNA is found within the mitochondria and each cell has many mitochondria.

    So, why is mtDNA important? Several reasons.

    The most important characteristics of mtDNA are that it is passed from generation to generation by the maternal linage, mutates rarely, is exceptionally hardy, and is found in places where nuclear DNA doesn’t exist.

    Your mtDNA is inherited unchanged from your mother and only from your mother. And she received hers from her mother, and her mother from her mother, and so on. Why is this? At fertilization, the egg supplies the cell and half the DNA while the sperm supplies only half the DNA. The sperm cell itself breaks down and disintegrates after passing its genetic material into the nucleus of the egg cell. This means that all the cell components
    of the developing zygote come from the mother. This includes the mitochondria. As the cell divides and multiplies, these mitochondria are copied and passed on, generation after generation. This means that all the cells of the body contain identical mtDNA.

    Also, mtDNA rarely mutates. It is thought to undergo a significant mutation approximately once every 6500 years. Thus, it is very stable. This means that your mtDNA is virtually identical to your mother’s, your great-great grandmother, and your maternal ancestors from 1000 years ago. Thus, your maternal linage can be accurately traced over many generations. This is true of both males and females. Sons have the same mtDNA as their mother, grandmother, and so on. The difference is that
    daughters will then pass this mtDNA on to their children through their eggs, but sons will not—they only donate sperm to future off spring.

    Let’s say a skeleton is found. It could be recent or centuries old. Nuclear DNA may not be present, but mtDNA, which is hardier, may be. Particularly within the cells of the bones or the pulp of the teeth, where mtDNA can survive for centuries. The matching of the mtDNA from the skeletal remains with a living person reveals that the two shared the same maternal ancestry. They may be sisters, mother and daughter, grandmother and
    granddaughter, or a remote maternal ancestor from 1000 years ago. This connection may be the clue needed to identify who the skeleton was. In forensics, the identity of a skeletal remains is crucial to solving any homicide. Why? Ninety plus percent of murders occur between people who know or are related to one another.

    Lastly, mtDNA is found where nuclear DNA isn’t. Like in hair. Hair is made up of dead cells from the hair follicle. Follicle cells have nuclei and thus nuclear DNA, but when the cells die and are pushed outward as hair, the nuclei are lost. If the hair found at a crime scene has follicle tissue attached (as is often the case if it has been pulled out) then great. The ME has nuclear DNA to work with. But if it doesn’t have follicle tissue (which is the case if it simply falls out as happens every minute of every day) then there is no nuclear DNA. But the dead cells that make up the hair do contain mtDNA. So, if a murder victim is found and hair from the perpetrator is present, and the mtDNA from this hair can be
    matched to a person, then that person and the perpetrator must share a common maternal linage. This narrows the list of possible suspects considerably. Sometimes to one—the person the crime scene hair mtDNA was matched to.

    DP Lyle, MD

    9 Responses to “Understanding Mitochondrial DNA by DP Lyle, MD”

    1. Doug,

      Thanks for the mtDNA 101. I’m printing it out for future reference. Now that I have this knowledge, I feel like I should use it!

      Thanks, too, for being our guest blogger today.

      ~heather

      by Heather on April 16th, 2006 at 8:32 am

    2. I second that Doug,

      Thanks for the fascinating information.

      by Jeff on April 16th, 2006 at 9:25 am

    3. Great stuff.
      Don

      by don on April 16th, 2006 at 9:49 am

    4. Does that mean that mtDNA cannot be used to make a positive ID on a suspect? What are the odds that a mtDNA match is specific to an individual?
      In other words, compared to nuclear DNA which is specific to the individual at astronomical odds, what are the odds using mtDNA? (I’d imagine the odds ratio would be Odds using nuclear DNA divided by number of maternal lineages present.)

      by Jeff on April 16th, 2006 at 1:19 pm

    5. Fascinating stuff. Thanks for posting this!

      Another question I’m curious about. What does a mtDNA test cost, and how long does it take to get results?

      by Bill on April 16th, 2006 at 6:23 pm

    6. If there is so little mutation, it would seem like this data would almost be useless. Wouldn’t the number of people with identical mtDNA account for huge portions of the population?

      On the other hand, I wonder if this might help in geneology? This might bridge gaps left by incomplete records.

      by LNLisa on April 17th, 2006 at 10:37 am

    7. Some good questions.

      1–mtDNA will only show that 2 people are maternally related. But this may be enough. For example, if someone says he or she is the daughter of a wealthy, deceased couple and is due the inheritance, she can be proven an imposter by comparing her mtDNA with that of the deceased mother–may require exhuming the body–or by comparing her mtDNA to a known child of the couple or to the maternal grandmother’s mtDNA or to a maternal aunt’s mtDNA. The maternal grandmother, the mother, the maternal aunt, and all the mother’s true children would have the same mtDNA. But, it can’t be used to absolutely ID someone or to absolutely prove paternity. That requires nuclear DNA.

      2–the cost varies from place to place but it isn’t cheap. I’m not sure what the actual price is. In most labs it takes a couple of weks to get results. Could be a little faster if rushed but that’s the ballpark.

      3—It’s true that many people will share the same mtDNA but if so they also share a common maternal ancestry. This is very useful as decribed above. The above scenario could also apply if a corpse or skeletal remains are found. The ID of the skeleton is critical to solving the crime since 90% of the time murder takes place between 2 people who know each other. So, mtDNA from the corpse or the bones can be compared to mtDNA from a sibling or mother or maternal grandmother of the person suspected of being the corpse or skeleton and this can serve as the needed identity. For example, if the skeletal remains of a young female is found and if a young lady matching the same general age and size was reported missing a year earlier, mtDNA from the mother can be compared to that of the skeleton. A match would be strong evidence that the skeleton did indeed belong to the missing girl. Of course, having nuclear DNA from the bones compared to DNA from both parents would prove the ID beyond question. But nuclear DNA is not always available. And since mtDNA is more hardy than nuclear DNA that may be all that is available. Strong though not absolute proof. But then again how many 15 year old relatives of the mother are missing?
      It’s the unchanging nature of mtDNA that makes it so valuable–particularly as you pointed out in the field of genealogy. Bones of someone 500 years old could have usable mtDNA and this could be used to prove that a currently living person came from the same maternal linage as the bones.

      D. P. Lyle, MD

      by D. P. Lyle, MD on April 18th, 2006 at 12:19 pm

    8. dr. doug

      thanks so much–again–for info. you are the greatest!!!!

      gay

      by gay toltl kinman on April 18th, 2006 at 8:08 pm

    9. Cool site. Thanks:-)
      anime porn videos

      by anime porn videos on September 4th, 2007 at 3:21 am

    Leave a Reply